Western Rifle Shooters Association

Do not give in to Evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Alrighty Then



From Breitbart.tv, the continuing implementation and expansion of Frank the Cripple's Second Bill of Rights:

***
...This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our Nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. "Necessitous men are not free men." People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens. For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world.

One of the great American industrialists of our day—a man who has rendered yeoman service to his country in this crisis-recently emphasized the grave dangers of "rightist reaction" in this Nation. All clear-thinking businessmen share his concern. Indeed, if such reaction should develop—if history were to repeat itself and we were to return to the so-called "normalcy" of the 1920's—then it is certain that even though we shall have conquered our enemies on the battlefields abroad, we shall have yielded to the spirit of Fascism here at home.

I ask the Congress to explore the means for implementing this economic bill of rights- for it is definitely the responsibility of the Congress so to do. Many of these problems are already before committees of the Congress in the form of proposed legislation. I shall from time to time communicate with the Congress with respect to these and further proposals. In the event that no adequate program of progress is evolved, I am certain that the Nation will be conscious of the fact.

Our fighting men abroad- and their families at home- expect such a program and have the right to insist upon it. It is to their demands that this Government should pay heed rather than to the whining demands of selfish pressure groups who seek to feather their nests while young Americans are dying...
***


Sixty-five years of this rot gets us to today -- a bankrupt Empire trying to keep the con going just a while longer.

Shameful.

15 Comments:

Anonymous Kerodin said...

The Rights articulated for us, recognized by us, embodied in our founding documents, ensured the Right of each American equal opportunity to earn what they want.

Earn it...that part's on you.

Goo luck to you...

Sam
III

December 7, 2010 at 4:46 AM  
Blogger Bill St. Clair said...

For some reason, those who believe in positive rights never understand that assured income is only made possible by massive theft. But then, almost everyone you talk to thinks that taxes are a necessary evil. Except me and a few of my agorist friends.

December 7, 2010 at 1:08 PM  
Blogger Pat H. said...

Some old progressive/fascist clap trap.

There are no such things as political rights. There is no right to vote, voting is a privilege with the parameters set by the states.

Rights are natural, intrinsic to human existence. They do not include a right to food provided by others, nor a home provided by others, and not to a job provided by others.

While I cannot deny you access to the job application process (unless I own the job), cannot deny you access to purchase or receive food, deny you access to purchase any house you desire; the access is a right; the actual acquisition is not.

All rights stand on the right private property. The Self Defense right, on which the right to own and use any weapon is based, is itself based on the fact that you own yourself.

Self ownership is why slavery, including military slavery (aka draft), is an assault on rights.

December 7, 2010 at 2:53 PM  
Blogger Radiowave said...

"...under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—" Ah, poltical rights, which must arrive and depart courtesy of certain inalienable politicians, of course.

December 7, 2010 at 3:21 PM  
Blogger Dedicated_Dad said...

Shameful Indeed.

Never better illustrated than by the shameLESS bigotry of the beast in the video.

This... thing is so consumed by her flat-out racist ideology that she cannot fathom the generosity she witnessed as a child. Somehow, in her twisted mind, for a wealthier woman to give her shoes to a "less-fortunate" is nothing more than a callous exhibition of power - equivalent to rubbing a dog's nose in its own feces.

Make no mistake -- these people now rule.

I too was raised poor, son of an old-school pentecostal preacher. Most years I got two pairs of "toughskins" jeans - a product which I must admit still fills me with revulsion... Otherwise every item of clothing I owned was a hand-me-down from some parents in the church.

As a child I HATED this fact - especially after one too many instances of some kid announcing in front of the group "Hey... that's MY old shirt!"

As a MAN however, I have (as instructed) "put away childish things."

This female (she's no Lady, and not my idea of a woman either) - like so many of her ilk - has obviously never matured, and remains the same bitter child she's always been.

The problem with this should be plain -- she's now in a position of power sufficient to wreak her vengeance on the objects of her (ultimately SELF-) hatred: all of us with "white" skin. Her power is focused on punishing those she views as "The Enemy" - and sadly she's not alone.

Personally, I still long for the day when a man will be judged by the content of his character - and not the color of his skin. 35 years ago this was a laudable "Dream" - today it marks anyone not a member of some officially-sanctioned victim-group as a racist/sexist/whatever-phobic monster in need of reeducation.

35 years ago, people RIGHTLY asked for America's promise -- equality of opportunity -- to be kept. Today they DEMAND to be treated as "more equal than others."

One can sense the irrational bitterness and rage simmering wetly below the surface, ever alert for any perceived sleight to justify its ongoing existence. So now we pretend, while we victimize a whole new generation of people and produce a new class of victim -- thus ensuring the perpetuation of that which we're allegedly trying to eradicate.

it would almost be funny if it weren't so dangerously sick...

December 7, 2010 at 3:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have no idea what the hell the woman in the video was talking about. Partly due to poor audio quality but also due to her nonsensical delivery.

As for "Frank the cripple" and his SOTU address, I can only comment on some of it. My opinion, for what it is worth: His endeavor to become an "active partner against human slavery" was facilitated by enslaving his countrymen with a SS tax and all the rest of his "New Deal" scheme. Comments like, "a world gravely threatened by gangster rule" were hyperbolic and a mere foreshadowing of that very rule to visit our homeland.

"Ostrich isolationism" was another bit of hyperbole to pervert the Founder's principal of avoiding "foreign entanglements".

his "supreme objective of security" resulted in the damnable United Nations and all of their cursed treaties.

From Louis McFadden to Francis Shoemaker to Jacob Thorkelson to John Wood to James Utt to Wright Patman, all of them spoke truth about the Federal Reserve banking cartel, the U.N. the World Bank and on and on. Today they are ridiculed by popular historians as being anti-Semites, isolationists, reactionary fools. I wonder where would America be had we listened to them? I doubt we would be facing this monster that is now "eating out our substance" and "sending hither swarms of officers to harass our people".

Look at the history of the U.N. Everywhere they have gone to create peace and build nations has been a failure. Do we dare call Haiti, Rwanda, Yugoslavia, Ethiopia, Sudan successes? Has the transfer of multi-billions of dollars(theft)made the world more secure? More united?

FDR was considered a great orator. So, likewise is Obama.
Americans buy into rhetoric and smooth oration but sadly, can not understand substance or the lack of it.

I weep or my homeland.

KPN3%

December 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

...and before I am labeled a Jew-hater or Nazi-sympathizer or other such nonsense, I will state, unequivocally, that I am not!

Keep in mind however, that Communists murdered many more innocent human beings than the Nazi regime ever did. Yet the left seems to have a romantic affair with Marxism/Communism/Socialism.

We can argue for or against the merits of U.S. involvement in WW2 but what did it get us? There is evidence that FDR allowed the bombing of Pearl Harbor to happen for the purpose of gaining support for U.S. to enter the war. He interned Japanese Americans and permitted their land to be stolen from them. He suspended the Constitution. He outlawed the private ownership of gold. He grew the federal government exponentially. and much much more.

Still today he is applauded for his actions.

KPN3%

December 7, 2010 at 7:05 PM  
Anonymous Walking Horse said...

Although the term "cripple" is physically correct, I think "crippler" might better capture the legacy of FDR.

December 7, 2010 at 8:54 PM  
Anonymous Defender said...

Diversifier-in Chief Obama in Indonesia told students the U.S. motto is E pluribus unum -- "Out of many, one." Congress issues him an F. "One Nation Under God," since 1956.

http://www.forbes.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=216891

December 8, 2010 at 2:24 AM  
Anonymous Justin said...

This embodies the philosophy that drives an individual to survive through the plunder of others' time and effort.

i.e.- "I don't have it, so I'll take yours through force."

We are living in a nation of plundering vikings who outsource their looting and raiding to FedGov agents (They pay for those outsourced services with looted funds as well).

Oh the joy.

Justin

December 8, 2010 at 2:36 AM  
Anonymous Defender said...

She sure sounds angry still over the racist degradation of her and her grandmother 40 years ago. It's something to be angry about. But a ranking federal official, preaching it as them-against-us in almost the second decade of the 21st Century hits me very wrong. It's a trend.
When she says she wants every man, woman and child to be able to communicate with the entire world, she's not talking about US. She means under the regulations of Net Neutrality. Disagreeing with authority is "hate speech" and not allowed. Criticizing archaic religiopolitical tyrannies is "prejudice" and not allowed. There's more to this than free broadband for inner-city residents.
Of course when everyone has their telescreen, we can do away with polling places and get straight to direct mob rule. Vote for a candidate using your Google or Facebook account -- all six of them. Vote for the proper punishment for today's domestic extremist after the Three Minutes Hate.

December 8, 2010 at 4:38 AM  
Blogger Dedicated_Dad said...

Defender said: "She sure sounds angry still over the racist degradation of her and her grandmother 40 years ago. It's something to be angry about..."

WHAT??!!

Giving shoes to someone you view as "less fortunate" is now "racist degradation"?

Ye gods and little fishes: Did ANYONE listen to this thing talk?

December 8, 2010 at 10:28 PM  
Anonymous Mark Matis said...

Just remember:

When the time comes, DO NOT waste your efforts on the bloviating cows and pontificating turds. Instead, FIRST deal with their enablers. When THOSE are gone is the time to turn to the others. When you can deal with them personally and appropriately.

December 9, 2010 at 12:56 AM  
Anonymous Defender said...

Paul Krugman says Obamacare will eventually need to be supported by a combination of death panels and the Value Added Tax. In those words.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDnvmOQDkkw

December 9, 2010 at 2:14 AM  
Anonymous Defender said...

Dad, I accept the tongue-lashing. I bought in to the part about the shoes being the wrong size and more of an insult than a gift. That's exactly what she wanted. It made me forget that this better-off white woman provided Granny A JOB. Beyond paying her, she didn't owe the family jack.
I guess I'm still recovering from my liberal indoctrination.
Thanks for the kick in the pants.
Now I realize she wouldn't have been satisfied if Mrs. Whitey had bought her Pradas and gotten down on her knees to polish them.

December 10, 2010 at 4:36 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home