Sultan Knish: Muslim Men & Non-Muslim Women
Speaking about the unspeakable in this piece from Sultan Knish.
But remember:
Islam is a religion of peace.
Islam is a religion of peace.
Islam is a religion of peace.
That chanting, along with three clicks of your ruby slippers, will keep your wives, daughters, sisters, and mothers safe.
You can go back to your sports programming now, infidel.
For now.
posted by Concerned American | 3:23 PM
15 Comments:
Death to Islam. III.
Why do you insist upon doing the work of your enemies?
But remember:
Pharisaic Judaism is a religion of peace.
Rabbinic Judaism is a religion of peace.
Judæo-Fascism is a religion of peace.
That chanting, along with three clicks of your ruby slippers, will keep your home, job, and 401k safe.
You can go back to your sports programming now, goyim
For now.
Do you understand yet?
FWM:
Holy loin of pork!
Thanks for pointing out the threat posed to all right-minded folks by the Jooooooooooooooooooos!
Now that I know of their nefarious schemes, I can better protect my family and friends.
Bad Jooos!
Bad!!
Keep up the good work, FWM.
Hello FWM,
Do you co-occupy Portland Oregon with me? This is a good place to get to know "actual American Jooows". You will find them harmless and often skilled and helpful in non-traditional occupations requiring smarts and detail work like gunsmithing.
Judaism does not require me to convert. In fact, they would just as soon that I completely ignore their daughters, as the women have been trained to ignore me as a "non-appropriate scholar" or some kind of Viking-descended savage. The point is that all the versions of Jewish observance/worship/association mentioned are no threat to me personally, politically, or financially.
Islam doesn't have "versions": all Islam is ONE. If they claim to be "good Muslims" they are practicing religious deception and should be vigorously opposed and rapidly deported from civilized nations as an immediate threat.
Deportation is not punishment for a crime, it is a protective behavior to preserve OUR nation.
Cheers.
I just so happen to be working on an article addressing muslim women...
Yeah, the Paki knuckle draggers take their cue from their preachers just like any other unthinking followers. The only thing they respect is a successful application of force-something I stress repeatedly in the upcoming article and in general.
Meanwhile we got our problem with a political and legal system hostile to our Rights. Just posted a article here:
http://freedomguide.blogspot.com/2011/03/self-defense-and-how-to-get-away-with.html
Don't worry some of the visiting Anarchists assured me that Islam is no threat over on Sipsey Street a while back.
Now we can all go back to sleep. Nothing to see here.
And I have some Nevada ocean front property and a bridge for sale cheap.
"The war against Islam will be won in the bedroom."
Remember that.
"Don't worry some of the visiting Anarchists assured me that Islam is no threat over on Sipsey Street a while back."
Islam still isn't a major threat, nor are illegal immigrants from Mexico, or Jews. The major problem is American voters, who've hired a "government" to prevent you from defending yourself from the various rapists, muggers and thieves.
Women in Muslim countries could conceal an AK under that tent-dress, and shoot any man that assaults them. Why don't they? Because, somehow, those women agree with Islam's opinion of them. Americans who allow the TSA to view and touch them have the same mental problem.
Why is it so hard to conceive of a world in which freedom-loving individuals face multiple existential threats?
Anon @5:42,
I'm an anarchist. Mahomettanism is a threat. But do you know what? Like the State, or any other lethal idea, it only has power insofar as people believe in it and yield their power to it.
The only way to destroy Mahomettanism is by refusing to believe in the idea, and convincing others to do the same. And to destroy any clear, imminent threat to life, liberty or property. The agents of a State are not qualified to make the judgment of who poses a "clear, imminent threat."
You will never destroy Mahomettanism by killing off every Mahomettan, even if it were moral to attempt to do. (Which it is not.) There are people out there who believe that torture is moral. It is moral and legal to use lethal violence against someone who is inflicting torture. It is not moral or legal to use lethal violence against someone who believes torture is acceptable.
I think I'll wear my infidel shirt today.
Resist.
AP
Like I said Nevada ocean front property real cheap.
Happy D, you going to personally start killing Mahomettans indiscriminately? No? Why not?
Brass would you mind pointing out where in the posts above I advocated killing anyone let alone indiscriminately?
“you going to personally start killing Mahometans indiscriminately? No? Why not?”
To answer your question I am not a cowardly back stabbing Anarchist thug or one of their Progressive-collectivist fellow travelers. Thus I avoid indiscriminate killing in general as well as the initiation of violence. Unlike Anarchists whom have historically killed for pleasure and personal gain more often than not.
Whereas the Muslims/Islam have both collectively and individually initiated force on most every other group and individuals indiscriminately. Should I idly stand by the blood of the innocent or the helpless?
Or should I rob their bodies like an Anarchist?
That an Anarchist (an advocate of one of the most indiscriminately violent philosophies in existence,) has the audacity to complain about others use of violence is the height of Hypocrisy.
From Wikipedia, Hypocrisy is the state of pretending to have beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually have. Hypocrisy involves the deception of others and is thus a kind of lie.
In a world were Fascism or Socialism worked Anarchism would have worked better. They did not work. But every place these systems were tried they turned into crimes against humanity. Or in the case of anarchist groups were absorbed into the aforementioned systems. While in operation the unproductive leeched off the productive just like the public sector unions here in the U.S. or the Socialists everywhere.
In practice anarchism has proven to be virtually indistinguishable from Socialism.
So save your false moral superiority for some one that is unaware of the cesspit you are drowning in.
Time to go British and reinvoke Rule 303. Well, I guess we have to go with the Revised Rule 556, 762, or 127.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home