Con-Con Con, Encore
The gullible and the Evil are beginning to pound the drums once again for a new Constitutional Convention.
Very, very bad idea.
Do you really think this idea is arising spontaneously?
Do you really think the FreeFor could operate effectively in opposition to the collectivists in a Con-Con environment?
On what factual basis do you believe that?
Some background on the convention process here:
Phyllis Schlafly opines on this topic, but Matt Bracken gets the last word.
Read the excerpt from his third novel and ask yourself Lenin's question:
...Marx's emphasis on class conflict provided Lenin with an easy category for identifying his enemies. Also, Marxism was posited on the ideas of a single absolute truth, the predestined victory of the cause, and the fallibility and expendability of the individual. Therefore it lent itself to the suppression of dissenters and vidual. Therefore it lent itself to the suppression of dissenters and the extermination of opponents. Lenin, with his knack for hortatory pungency, reduced the past and future alike to two pronouns and a question mark: "Who—whom?" No verb was necessary. It meant who would prevail over whom? And the question was largely rhetorical, implying that the answer was never in doubt. Lenin and those who followed him would prevail over "them," whoever they were...
Hint: On current course and speed, you are "them".