Western Rifle Shooters Association

Do not give in to Evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it

Monday, November 1, 2010

No


Bill St. Clair links to an important long-term project in the ramp-up stage.

Read and think.

Or would you rather just do what the PTB want you to do?

Choose wisely.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Had me there until I saw who is organizing this. Has any of Tom Knapp's ideas ever actually worked?

November 1, 2010 at 5:00 AM  
Anonymous Defender said...

Saddam Hussein, Moammar Khadafy and other tyrants get 100% of the vote in the elections they control.
In a developed, educated country like ours, that would be too obvious, so the elites squeak by by a 3-5% margin almost all the time, and call it a "mandate from the people."
I can see opting out of the corrupt system. All of them. Have you seen the commercial "In trouble with the IRS for not paying taxes for five years or more?"
Five years of shaking your guns -- and unconfiscated money -- in the tyrants' faces.
If your child ran through his allowance by drinking, drugging, gambling and paying prostitutes, you'd cut him off, right? Now imagine that he told you it's HIS house and you'd better shape up and keep the dough dropping or bad things will happen.
You'd put his stuff in the street and change the locks. At least I hope you would.

November 1, 2010 at 12:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2 wings of the same bird;
http://dollarcollapse.com/uncategorized/art-of-the-collapse-october-2010/

November 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM  
Blogger Graybeard said...

Here in Florida, there's early talk about a constitutional amendment to add "None of the Above" to the ballot. That might get more people to the polls.

In the event "None of the Above" wins, the candidates would be barred from running for that office for a couple of election cycles.

I'm not sure if there's a real organization working to put it on the ballot, but it's got good word of mouth buzz going for it.

November 1, 2010 at 10:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would definitely back a binding NOTA option.
Imagine being able to force the parties to eventually submit worthwhile candidates. Awesome!


III

November 4, 2010 at 12:20 PM  
Blogger daniel said...

Those who care but dont want either of the big government parties HAVE been doing a NOTA vote by voting libertarian. Unfortunately, its only a small percentage who do this. The fat is that enough of the electorate support the dems and GOP to enough of a degree as to allow the situation we have. If a majority or even a significant plurality actually wanted smaller, constitutionally compliant government, they would vote libertarian. The sad fact is that too many of the voters view libertarianism as "too extreme" and the two mainstream political parties as "good enough."

The majority of the electorate wants minimum wage, the IRS, the DEA, and the ATF. If this were not the case, we'd see libertarians winning elections.

I'll be organizing armed RTC's as close to the polls as possible on election day 2012, targeting the voters themselves with the message.........while openly carrying a slung rifle and holstered pistol. This is the ONLY plan out there, other than starve-the-monkey-ism, that addresses the difficult-to-deal-with fact that a majority of Americans actually want big government and dont want the Constitution.

Controversial, bold action is the only thing that has a chance of working. If something sounds too easy, too good to be true, it probably is. A plan without risk and sacrifice, at this point, doesnt sound likely to produce a result.

November 8, 2010 at 3:20 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home