Denninger: Questioning The Fed's Constitutionality
Karl Denninger continues his thought-leadership here.
Start thinking through how to support an occupation of the Federal District of Columbia, as he suggests.
Do not give in to Evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
posted by Concerned American | 3:56 PM
5 Comments:
The Federal Reserve Banking Act was unlawful (un-Constitutional see Article 1 Section 8 clause 5 and Artc. 1, sec. 10, cl. 1) when it was passed by congress in December 23rd, 1913.
It has been unlawful for 97 years and is the root of the troubles America faces.
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws...."
Mayer Anselm Rothschild
And if the Rothschild name sounds familiar to students of history it is because that family has been controlling nations (fomenting revolution) emperors and kings for many centuries by controlling the money. Fiat currencies have long been a tool of war and manipulator of the masses of uninformed.
KPN3%
Hat tip to Deninger...my associates thought me nuts when I suggested that action item.
"...is the root of the troubles America faces."
The root of troubles America faces is the slow abandonment of our previous moral system which featured trust, loyalty, reputation, responsibility, belief, and fairness. In other words, it was Biblical.
Man has a place for God. This separates us from the beasts. It does not mean that this place will be filled with God. All sorts of things can take that place, including puffing oneself up to fill it up. If it is not "other" and not fundamentally "good," rot will ensue. A Nation of God-Fearing, educated people would never let a travesty like the Federal Reserve exist.
Mike
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=2257610
Screw all this constitutionality talk.
They don't care. Wake up. This argument is futile and pointless.
Speak in a language they can understand. They ignore and refuse to listen to appeals to law and constitution. One finds it measureably harder to ignore a screaming mob.
Until Freefor realizes that it does not posses the initiative to control the context and terms of the fight, we will go nowhere. We keep appealing to reason and law and constitution, but THEY DON'T CARE. Freefor keeps insisting on using arguments and reasoning that is irrelevant, sometimes even empowering, to the opposition. Like fighting a fire with kerosene. Like punishing a criminal by throwing marshmallows at him.
KPN3% said:
"It has been unlawful for 97 years and is the root of the troubles America faces."
97 years. Arguments and politics have failed to reign this garbage in for 97 years. Do you think that tactic has demonstratably failed yet?
What I'm getting at is this:
Like Karl, I believe that all this talk is pointless. These civilized "rallies are pointless. Until we show up at their doorstep, Sons-of-Liberty style, nothing will change. Do we value our much-lauded freedom and liberty enough to do that?
So far, Freefor actions say no. So, like Karl says in the link posted above, until then, grab a stick. It'll still hurt but at least you won't bite your own tongue off.
Meanwhile, as CA says, we all (self included) wait like ninja grey men in the shadows, to strike like panthers and cobras.
Let's print up some more stickers. Let's make some more phone calls and send more emails. Vote in more dead elephants. Yeah, that'll show them. It's worked so well so far... Not one more step back and all... *rolls eyes*
We're screwed.
Justin
One of the favorite tactics of our justice department drug warriors is to freeze the bank accounts and assets of their target.
I oddly enough began to recently consider how the PatFor could freeze the assets of the enemies of freedom.
The Fed Reserve seems to me to be a good place to focus this line of thinking.
Grenadier1
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home