Western Rifle Shooters Association

Do not give in to Evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it

Friday, February 19, 2010

Oathkeepers on O'Reilly

Go to Oathkeepers.org for more information on Oathkeepers and their mission.


Blogger Paul said...

Contact O'Reilly with "pithy" comments. If we bombard the guy, maybe he'll shut up and stop spouting the statist line on guns (I'm not expecting a 60-something y.o. to suddenly see the light - just shutting up would satisfy me).


February 19, 2010 at 3:01 PM  
Anonymous Defiant III said...

Bill O'Reilly is a phucking left wing loon, blow hard asshole who poses as an independent conservative. He is nothing more than a neo-statist progressive.

That interview has given me just cause to loose what extremely little respect I have for Bill (left wing loon) O'Reilly.

I like Stewart Rhodes and support his goal in principle but he is misguided in allowing STATE SPONSORED DOMESTIC TERRORIST Anti-AMERICAN TRAITORS aka tax grazing Law Enforcement Officers who abuse their oath, position, authority, and UNCONSTITUTIONAL powers to terrorize and abuse law abiding, tax paying, patriotic American Citizens, Military, and Veterans among the ranks of the Oath Keepers.

Perhaps Stewart Rhodes has not read Mike Vanderboegh's open letter to law enforcement yet.......the Oath Keeper will get my FULL support when Stewart Rhodes posts a substantially similar open letter to law enforcement.

Defiant III

February 19, 2010 at 3:40 PM  
Blogger chris horton said...

Stewart gets better and better each time I see and listen to him speak.

O'Reilly is just one of the millions of brainwashed masses that swallow everything.Gov spews regularly.


February 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM  
Anonymous patrick henry said...

O'Reilly - IMHO - just made it QUITE clear that he has chosen this day who HE serves.

He made quite clear that he considers the position that "disarming law-abiding citizens in their own homes REGARDLESS of circumstances is unConstitutional to be "an extreme position."

Let's just think for a moment...

IN essence, they said "You have the right to bear arms for personal defense, on your own property, unless a bunch of ferals is running amok - in which case we'll go door-to-door and disarm EVERYBODY, starting (natch) with the law-abiding people who are quietly hunkered down in their own homes."

I suppose that makes sense - like lug-nuts on a birthday cake!

For me, the proper sentiment toward O'REALLY?!! and his ilk can be summed up with the phrase "FEAFEFH."

Is there anyone left in the media - even Fox - who isn't controlled by Dear Reader and his puppet-masters?

February 19, 2010 at 4:09 PM  
Blogger Carl said...

Again, O'Reilly shows himself to be a Marxist MSM idiot. He steals conservative talking points only to drive his ratings. The man is a flake and a liar. He constantly distorts his opponents views to create an opportunity to attack. His interviews consist of ad hominem atack, straw man arguments, and red herrings. No logic here, just liberal propaganda.

February 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

After watching the interview on Faux News, it's apparent to me that O'Reilly is either abysmally ignorant about the Constitution, a first class fraud, a wolf in sheep's clothing, or all of the above. The fact that this shill for the Saudis is so popular shows the gullibility of the American people. And this, in itself, is frightening. I cannot speak for the other true patriots, but the time for talk shows, talk radio, letters to editors and politicans is long past. Get in shape, get prepared, watch and listen. Alea iacta est.

February 19, 2010 at 5:32 PM  
Blogger Mayberry said...

What a freakin' hit job. O'Reilly is a weasel, just another scum sucking stooge, for whom a special place awaits in hell. That's why Michael Savage calls him "the leprechaun....

February 20, 2010 at 1:31 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

O'Reilly's job is to confuse by presenting a false dichotomy. He is but another treasonous MSM whore.


February 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM  
Blogger Pat H said...

As Tom DiLorenzo so appropriately said here, O'Reilly invoked one of the most tyrannical monsters America has ever seen to rationalize what went on in New Orleans after Katrina.


You always know that when someone invokes Lincoln that they don't care if you're raped, burned to death, economically destroyed, or outright murdered in order to do what they want to do.

That's Bill O'Reilly.

February 21, 2010 at 2:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

O'Reilly is a progressive mouthpiece for the fascists if he believes that the belief that sticking to the Constitution is an extremist position.

February 24, 2010 at 2:52 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

O'Reilly cares about:

1. Whatever aggrandizes O'Reilly.

2. Whatever enriches O'Reilly like doormats emblazoned w/ the words AMERICAN PATRIOT. Now tell me, why would ANY self-respecting American buy such an abomination? Kinda gives you an idea of what Bilious really thinks about the intellect of those who truly love this country.

3. The Roman Catholic Church.

Btw, Hannity & Bill Bennett aren't much better than Bilious, nor is Hugh Hewitt if my suspicions are correct. Maybe it's a Fenian thing.

Cassandra (of Troy)

February 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


The ONLY pithy comments you're likely to ever see are the 3 he responded to on the 19th. After that, & barring a full fledged national firestorm that affects his pose as the ONLY guy who's "lookin' out for the folks", (& more importantly his bankroll) the subject's "officially" closed as far as His Majesty is concerned. That's the way Mr. "No Spin" deals w/ opposition that's likely to expose him for the pseudo-intellectual, loud mouthed, bullying jerk he is, & the hilariously ironic thing is that he & his equally obnoxious & narcissistic "nephew" Prince Sean lambaste Commissar Olbermann on MSNBC for being an imperious hypocrite!

Cassandra (of Troy)

February 25, 2010 at 10:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

chris horton:

I thought Rhodes did reasonably well myself but his main failing was assuming he'd get a relatively reasonable chance to make his case. He should've went into that interview w/ the same attitude he'd have if the invite was from MSNBC or CNN. The only other thing I think he should've done was when Bilious went on his "security @ ANY cost" tirade "justifying" the N.O.P.D.'s confisaction of guns needed for self-defense by those who chose/had to stay in their homes after Katrina subsided. Rhodes either didn't catch or was too polite to bring up that O'Bilious was equating the decent people who had guns for protection w/ the bands of bipedal vermin that used guns for criminal purposes. Positing that as a question would likely have set Mr. "No Spin" off on another rant about "the public's/LE's right to safety", which might've allowed Rhodes to bring up that the majority of the N.O.P.D. had split & not returned for duty, that more than a few cops were taking advantage of the situation to do some "shopping" themselves, & that the situation the decent people of N.O. were in was similar to that of those in L.A. after the Rodney King riot began & that both groups armed themselves for the same reason,: The cops left & the scum had a party. A quickly inserted follow-up comment could've been that like in N.O., the Mayor & Police Chief of L.A. also declared a "state of emergency" that included gun/ammo bans & threats to arrest ANYONE w/ a gun who wasn't LE even if they were defending their home/business. And if O'Bilious was stupid or discombobulated enough to let Rhodes say something else, he should've asked His Majesty if he thought the Koreans & other Angelenos who defended their homes & businesses w/ guns should've been busted for doing so. The reaction to THAT would've been FUN to see! Ah well, hopefully next time.

Cassandra (of Troy)

February 25, 2010 at 11:24 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home