Western Rifle Shooters Association

Do not give in to Evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Suprynowicz: An America That Could Elect Sarah Palin Might Still Save Itself

Thanks to Eric at the Clasical Values blog, we have this election-year article from no-compromise libertarian Vin Suprynowicz, author of The Ballad of Carl Drega and Send In The Waco Killers:

...Mind you, there's a good moral case to be made for not voting. By participating in the election, you tacitly acknowledge the winner has the right to do all the awful, unconstitutional, morally wrong things they now do in our names.

I still vote largely because the "Libertarian" button is available. This year, though, the Libertarian Party has nominated Fearless Drug Warrior Bob Barr, a man who has opposed medical marijuana initiatives, opposed needle exchanges, a man who zealously locked up for years those seeking to peacefully medicate themselves or help others to do so, shoving them into small cages where they're subject to anal rape by guys named "Bubba."

It's tempting to stay home on Nov. 4. But there's now at least a 50-50 possibility -- higher, given Americans' demonstrated reluctance to elect ultra-socialist Big City senators over the past 40 years -- that when Americans wake up Nov. 5 they'll rub their eyes and wonder what kind of a shuck job the Leftist Mainstream Press has spent the past year peddling them about some Chicago ward heeler whose silver tongue seemed to tie up pretty quick when he strayed from the prepared script and the Teleprompters, and how this same press corps largely missed the come-from behind Cinderella story of a guy they declared dead in the water in August of 2007.

Wishing won't make John McCain a small-government libertarian. But think back to how the defeatist fellow-travelers in the media ridiculed him when he said The Surge could defeat al-Qaida in Iraq.

Think back to when the genius political analysts told you McCain's campaign was dead, that this guy was so clueless he had no remaining plan but to spend the entire autumn in New Hampshire, hanging out and gabbing with the locals at Dunkin' Donuts.

And then last week my former senator, John McCain, threw the entire race into a maelstrom, confounding all expectations and common wisdom by choosing Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska as his running mate.

If Democrats believed what they say -- that Gov. Palin is such a poor choice that John McCain might as well fold his tent and go home -- they should be condescendingly patting the little lady on the head right now, saying, "Oh, how cute."

So how are we to explain the way the Democratic Party is now going after Sarah Palin and her perfectly lovely pregnant daughter, for all the world like the frenzied final holdouts on some Japanese-occupied Pacific atoll, shrieking "Banzai!" as they level their bayonets and charge the machine guns in their loincloths?

I've already lost count of the ways the ululating harridans have attacked this anti-corruption reformer. She can't be president because she lives too far from Washington. Because she bore a child with Down syndrome instead of aborting him. Because a woman with young children shouldn't put them through the strain of a campaign for high office. (Is the Democratic position now that only sterile old men should be president, or does that one apply only to women?)

Her husband wants Alaska's federal land turned over to the state (oh, the horror!) and had a DUI some decades back, before they were even married. (I don't believe the Democrats actually used the phrase "drunken Indian," any more than they specifically said a woman still of child-bearing age can't be president because she might be irritable during "that time of the month," though they sure went right up to the line. My, how thin is their veneer of political correctness?)

Why the desperation?

Because Vice President Sarah Palin would mean Americans could actually end up electing a woman president without tapping a manipulative, soulless, stay-married-just-to-stay-in-power socialist.

How dare the Republicans threaten to do that? Only the "progressive" party is supposed to be allowed to put the first articulate woman in line for the White House! Why, it's just like when the Republicans dared to put a conservative black man on the Supreme Court.

It's so wrong!

Read the whole thing, and before you dismiss his position as simply rehashed RNC talking points, take the time to read this recent article, in which Vin tells the ugly truth about the near-term electoral prospects for freedom lovers in this country.

My only request is that whatever voting decision you make, you make it from a clear-headed, no nonsense perspective.

We will all have to live with the results.

Tempus fugit.


Blogger tom said...

Thanks for the heads up.

September 9, 2008 at 3:49 AM  
Blogger chris horton said...

So I stopped on c-span tonight. Harry Reid is talking nonsense about irrevelant bills...

Than goes on the attack,asking, where is McCain...

WTF? Our "leaders" now bash each other on the floor? This is what it's come down to...

Lecherous,traitors,every one of them. Meanwhile WE bail everyone out,NOT the "gov't!"

Waiting for the pen to hit the shell...

September 10, 2008 at 2:31 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home