Western Rifle Shooters Association

Do not give in to Evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it

Monday, November 22, 2010

More TSA Molocaust

Denninger reports, then asks:

...Defend that.

Find a way to defend the separation of a child young enough that he still has a binky from his mother and the non-answers and obfuscation of the TSA.

Go ahead and try.

Still want to fly eh? 

Still gonna "submit"? 

Still ok with the claim that "you give up some of your rights when you buy an airline ticket"? 

Does that include having your children taken from you because their binky set off a metal detector?

You like being sheep?  Government property? Your own children no longer have a right to be with you because some TSA goon wants to get cute and play God?

Is there any reason why TSA should not be defunded in full as soon as the 112th Congress is seated?

Or does Leviathan really want to double-down?

TSA/DHS vehicular roadblocks are next, people.

Mark my words.

UPDATE 22 NOV 2010 1615 EST: Read Dedicated Dad's comment below and review the evidence yourself.


Blogger Taylor H said...

They ARE called the Transportation Safety Authority...I could easily see them being given broader authority.

November 22, 2010 at 5:00 AM  
Anonymous Justin said...


Denninger is right, you know.

Stationary roadblocks make outstanding, uh, locations of interest. Ask the IRA.

Stop effing submitting, people. Now.


November 22, 2010 at 5:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tired of long lines, physical molestation, and cancer-causing x-ray scans?

Submit to a retinal scan database and you can speed through TSA checkpoints with no delay!

Never be late for a flight, drivers license renewal, bank transaction, or grocery checkout ever again.

November 22, 2010 at 5:30 AM  
Blogger Curtis said...

Anonymous said...

Tired of long lines, physical molestation, and cancer-causing x-ray scans?

Submit to a retinal scan database and you can speed through TSA checkpoints with no delay!

Never be late for a flight, drivers license renewal, bank transaction, or grocery checkout ever again.

I was thinking the same thing when I put this story on my blog:

"Governments and large corporations are encouraging individuals to identify themselves using biometric data as opposed to traditional card forms of identification, such as drivers’ licenses and membership cards. The federal and local governments also have plans to collect DNA samples from people arrested for but not convicted of crimes. The public must take immediate action to stop this assault on privacy rights and prevent the unprecedented implementation of global technocratic tyranny."


November 22, 2010 at 5:53 AM  
Blogger Curtis said...

TSA/DHS vehicular roadblocks are next, people.

Mark my words.

"Pistole, 54, took over the TSA on July 1 after 26 years at the FBI. He said he wants to make the agency a full partner in U.S. counterterrorism efforts.

Members of Congress, including House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., have pressed the TSA to put more money into mass-transit security. Thompson met with Pistole on Thursday and said the two agreed.

Pistole said he wants TSA workers, including 47,000 screeners at 450 airports, to operate as a "national-security, counterterrorism organization, fully integrated into U.S. government efforts."

"I want to take TSA to the next level," Pistole said."

Are you seeing a picture here? Maybe Obamassiah is getting his National Security Force after all.


November 22, 2010 at 5:55 AM  
Blogger Concerned American said...

Couldn't I just get some kind of chip or mark that would let me travel and trade with greater convenience?


November 22, 2010 at 5:58 AM  
Anonymous Mark Matis said...

God damn the pigs to hell for what they have done to this country!

November 22, 2010 at 12:38 PM  
Blogger Pat H. said...

I think the late George Carlin had the long and short of it.


November 22, 2010 at 2:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

112th CONgress will most likely pass a tsa 'reform' bill that will give the bastards more money, more bodies and wider scope of operation. We shall see.

Ron Paul's simple dignity bill has precisely 2 co sponsors...not one of them a name you would recognize.

Where are our gallant defenders of liberty, the darlings of the Beck set? Where?

November 22, 2010 at 4:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

does anyone feel safe yet?


November 22, 2010 at 5:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

@ concerned dad,curtis, anonymous..

Going for the "Mark of the Beast"?

I think I know a "few"Christians who might have a problem with that...


November 22, 2010 at 5:31 PM  
Blogger Dedicated_Dad said...

The following is my comment from KD's site.

PLEASE READ IT - this story is BS.
I hate these goons as much as anyone can - but *THIS* story is either an outright lie, or the delusional ravings of a mentally-ill woman. Given her statements in her post about never going ANYWHERE without her "emergency xanax"... well...

Sorry -- she's a nutburger.

OF COURSE the vid by TSA was edited - it HAD to be in order to string together all of her travels. The post was followed-up or updated with links to the entire video from all the different angles available.

See the TSA post at http://blog.tsa.gov/2009/10/response-to-tsa-agents-took-my-son.html -- they post the *ENTIRE* video from 9 different cameras for the entire time she was in the checkpoint.

Look at those vids - I have. I actually had them open in different windows so as to make the overlap impossible to miss. Those vids show that what she claims not only did not, but *COULD NOT* have happened.

She's mentally ill. She's now faced with proof of her lies or delusions, so her defense-mechanisms force her to claim the vids were edited or admit what she said was not true. Since she's incapable of such an admission, she claims the vids have been "doctored."

The *FACT* is this: What she claimed simply DID. NOT. HAPPEN.

Likewise the "strip searched little boy" - By *HIS FATHER'S DESCRIPTION*, he was resistant to their "screening" so **DAD** pulled off his shirt and gave it to them to search.

The **TRUTH** about all of this is bad enough - and we should stick to it.

Sensationalism - especially when the claims we make *ARE NOT TRUE* does us ZERO good and in fact aids The Enemy.

We must not sacrifice our credibility.

Lying, or refusing to admit when we've made a mistake is what The Enemy does.

*WE* are better than that. We *MUST* be.

Sorry, but a retraction is in order.

No, I don't like it either - but if we're to ever beat The Enemy we must ALWAYS act with integrity and own our mistakes when we make them.


November 22, 2010 at 6:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't fall for it - this was debunked some time ago.


TSA may suck, but this gal is nuts.

November 22, 2010 at 6:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Panic set in. My hands began to shake. My body was sweating. My breath was short and my heart was racing.
They had taken my child and not told me.
Jackson was out of my eye sight.
I could not see my son."

This was classic fight or flight instinct signaling to the brain. Sadly, all this woman could muster were tears and a search for her bottle of anti-anxiety meds.

I passed pissed-off about 15 years ago and now I'm looking forward to those roadblocks. As Justin said, they "make outstanding, uh, locations of interest".


November 22, 2010 at 8:40 PM  
Blogger Dedicated_Dad said...

There's really no room for opinion.

Watch the 9 vids carefully. Note how she's on at least one camera at all times, and when moving from one to another on two of them as they overlap. On a couple of occasions (while moving from one's range into another) on 3 at once.

Pay attention to her movements, and those of the others visible in the frames as the vids overlap.

There are no gaps in time or in coverage. In sum, it DID NOT HAPPEN, PERIOD.

It's not about opinions, or timestamps, or anything else except the video evidence -- which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt it didn't happen!

Ergo, the TSA Dingos DID NOT eat her baby.

As to the 6 year old, look at the description of the vid on YT.

The man who witnessed the event, captured and posted the vid says:

"...The enraged father pulled his son (sic) shirt off and gave it to the TSA agent to search, thats (sic) when this video begins..."

Ergo - again - TSA DID NOT strip this little boy.

I'm most certainly not defending TSA - but LYING is what The Enemy does. When we tell lies (or get fooled and fail to issue a retraction) then we prove ourselves to be no more trustworthy than The Enemy.

Integrity is like virginity -- you have it or you don't.

We *MUST* - if we're to have any chance of beating The Enemy in The Court of Public Opinion.

There's plenty of egregious stuff we can use to demonstrate the depravity of these monsters -- we don't have to stoop to the level of The Enemy.

We're better than that!


November 23, 2010 at 4:40 AM  
Anonymous Defender said...

Stipulated, that her baby was never more than 10 feet away according to the video. I just finished telling a TV reporter that integrity is all; the side that has to lie has the weaker argument and deserves to lose. So I'm with you there, Dad.
What were they doing to her that they had to digitally blur on the video, out there in the middle of that big room with people passing by on all sides, for long minutes?
Maybe she considered them making her turn her back to the stroller as the baby being out of her sight, "taken." Children have been snatched in less time.
Being kept in that glass corral while a couple of dozen people passed by on either side, and a TSA agent languidly rearranged the trays on the conveyor must have been maddening. For someone with claustrophobia or agorophobia, it would be enough to panic them. I know someone like that, and they can see an event quite differently than everyone else remembers it.
Still looks like prisoner intake to me.

November 23, 2010 at 6:19 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We already have illegal roadblocks now.....they call them "border check points".....but they are 60-100 miles from the border in AZ.

I don't like the ACLU, but they are 100% right on this one.....go google "100 mile constitution free zone" and look at the map on their site. Then read up on the Supreme Court ruling this nonsense is perfectly legal. 2/3rds of the American public live within this 100 mile constitution free zone....most of our major cities are within 100 miles of the border....SF, LA, DC, Miami, Boston, Chicago, Seattle, Houston, New Orleans, etc.

Heck, here's the link: http://www.aclu.org/national-security_technology-and-liberty/are-you-living-constitution-free-zone

November 23, 2010 at 4:10 PM  
Anonymous Defender said...

One traveler's response when TSA wanted to scan him as he DISEMBARKED from an international flight and had already cleared customs.


November 23, 2010 at 8:07 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home