Western Rifle Shooters Association

Do not give in to Evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

A Message From Gun Owners of America

Obama Moves to Silence Gun Groups and Other Political Opponents
-- Bill clears committee hurdle, going to the House floor soon

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org


Tuesday, June 8, 2010


Fresh from his efforts to seize government control of the health services sector (ObamaCare) and the financial markets ("finance reform"), Barack Obama has a new priority: silence his political opposition.

As satisfying as it was for Obama to seize control of one-sixth of the economy, he has had to suffer protest from the "little people" (like us). So he is pushing the Orwellian "DISCLOSE" bill (HR 5175) to make sure gun groups and other pro-freedom forces cannot mobilize their members in the upcoming elections.

When Obama says "disclose," what he really means is "disclose gun group membership lists"

Not surprisingly, these efforts to shut down free speech don't apply to Obama allies, like Democratic-leaning labor unions. They only apply to groups which are not reliable Obama allies, like Gun Owners of America.

But, for those groups whose free speech is targeted for Obama's wrath under this bill, the consequences are severe:

* Under Title II of the bill, GOA (and other groups, as well as many bloggers) who merely mention public officials within 60 days of an election could be required to file onerous disclosures -- potentially including their membership lists.

* Also under Title II, GOA could be required to spend as much as half of the time of a 30-second ad on government-written disclosures.

* In addition, Sections 201 through 203 would potentially put the government's snooping eyes on any American who voices a political opinion, despite the fact that the Supreme Court, in Buckley v. Valeo, declared that Americans have a right to voice their opinion to an unlimited extent, if unconnected with a political campaign.

Here's an idea: If Obama is so irritated at the Supreme Court's defense of political free speech by groups like GOA, why doesn't he apply his sleazy new rules to his political allies, as well?

ACTION: Please urge your congressman to vote against the anti-gun HR 5175. This bill has moved out of committee and has now been placed on the House calendar.

You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send a pre-written message to your Representative.

----- Pre-written letter -----

Dear Representative:

I urge you to oppose HR 5175, a bill that will deny the free speech rights of all Americans. Under Title II of this bill:

* Groups like Gun Owners of America (and other groups, as well as many bloggers) who merely mention public officials within 60 days of an election could be required to file onerous disclosures -- potentially including their membership lists -- even though the Supreme Court has previously ruled in NAACP v. Alabama that membership lists (like those of GOA's) are off limits to government control.

* Also, groups like GOA and the NRA could be required to spend as much as half of the time of a 30-second ad on government-written disclosures.

* In addition, Sections 201 through 203 would potentially put the government's snooping eyes on any American who voices a political opinion, despite the fact that the Supreme Court, in Buckley v. Valeo, declared that Americans have a right to voice their opinion to an unlimited extent, if unconnected with a political campaign.

Here's an idea: If Obama is so irritated at the Supreme Court's defense of political free speech by groups like GOA, why doesn't he apply the new rules in HR 5175 to his political allies (like the labor unions), as well?

Suffice it to say, if you care anything about the First or Second Amendments, you will vote against HR 5175. GOA will be scoring this vote on their rating of Congress.

Sincerely,



Are you a GOA member?

You should be.

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Civil disobedience.A bad law does not deserve to be obeyed, or even acknowledged.

That, or Alinsky-ized. Make your enemy obey his own rules

B Woodman
III-per

wv: "pleded" -- Not guilty!

June 9, 2010 at 8:08 PM  
Blogger sofa said...

Frogs in the pot notice the water heating up...

June 9, 2010 at 10:23 PM  
Blogger tom said...

Am I a member?

Thomas Harris
Hays County, Texas
Born in Montana
Life Member, GOA

Don't reckon they'll mistake me for somebody else with a similar middle name as it's a bit odd, Mom's maiden name, but they know that. I've also engaged in business with many of their "suspected enemy" folk.

If they have an issue, I reckon they can ask me about it, but I'm not a criminal by being a life member of GOA, it just means I have a nice framed document on my wall.

III

Obama can't produce a BIRTH CERTIFICATE and I'll Draw you a ROAD MAP TO MY HOUSE AND BUSINESS.

Hiding in PLAIN SIGHT. For the past 30 years, even...if not longer.

June 10, 2010 at 4:30 AM  
OpenID gardenserf said...

I recently wrote an article on ammunition prices and how the past will relate to the future:

http://gardenserf.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/shooting-a-hole-in-the-ammunition-glut/

Is it possible to see this article featured on the main page of WRSA?

Thanks

June 11, 2010 at 8:51 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home