SCOTUS Update
Codrea's Examiner column has it.
This will not be a net win for gun owners.
Just watch.
posted by Concerned American | 4:04 AM
Western Rifle Shooters Association
Do not give in to Evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it
- Nyberg Flag Patch Update
- 23:59:59: A Letter to Your Local Chief Law Enforce...
- The Courts - Farther Down the Road to Hell
- Can Violence Solve Violence?
- It's For The Children
- Autoextinction
- “Yeah, but what does that Three Percent thing MEAN?”
- Why the Economic Theory of Mutually Assured Destru...
- Beck: The Whole Damned Country Is A "Place Like This"
- Up In The Sky
Shooting Resources
Basic Rifle Marksmanship Series
Practical Resources
The Next Steps Series
The Weapons Platform: You and Your Body
Political Resources
- Codrea's War on Guns
- Codrea's National Gun Rights Examiner
- Sipsey Street Irregulars
- Gun Owners of America
- Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
- FreeForces S2 - Gathering The Information The American Press Ignores
- Injustice Everywhere -- Daily Police Misconduct Reports
- Radley Balko's The Agitator
- Billy Beck
- New Paltz Journal
- Arctic Patriot
- John Venlet
- Ed Rasimus
- Bill St. Clair: End the War on Freedom
- Claire Wolfe's "Living Freedom"
- American Digest
- Cato Institute's Cato At Liberty Blog
- Second Amendment Patriots
- Citizens Committee For the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
- Keep & Bear Arms (RKBA news aggregator)
- Junior Deputy Accountant
- Surplusrifle.com
- Chris Muir's Day by Day
- View from the Porch
- Causapatet
- The Elector Retards
- The Liberty Sphere
- Memento Mori
- Arms and the Law
- Oleg Volk's A Human Right
- The Belmont Club
- Eternity Road
- John Robb's Global Guerrillas
- Big Fur Hat's 'I Own The World'
- Sense Of Events
- The Foundation for Economic Education
- Mish Shedlock's Global Economic Trends Analysis
- Bloomberg News
- Investor's Business Daily Editorials
- Telegraph (U.K.)
- Restore The Constitution
- The American Thinker
- Drudge Report
- Zero Hedge
- Real Clear Politics
- Real Clear Markets
- Real Clear World
- Breitbart's Big Government
- Maggie's Farm
- Instapundit
- Mises.org (Economics & Liberty)
- Michelle Malkin
- David Warren Online
- Power Line
- The People's Cube
- Chicago Boyz
- Theo Spark
- Samizdata
- Jihad Watch
- James Bovard
- Mark Steyn
- Sultan Knish
- John Batchelor
- The Cliffs of Insanity
- GardenSERF's Plot
- Free North Carolina
- Victor Davis Hanson
- Washington Rebel
- TL In Exile
- Gates of Vienna
- EU Referendum
- Autonomous Mind
- Asia Times
- Jamestown Foundation
- Pro Libertate
- Jim Sinclair's Mineset
- John Galt's Shenandoah
- Denninger's Market Ticker
- Matt Bracken's Enemies Foreign And Domestic
Links
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
3 Comments:
SCOTUS is deciding how few cake crumbs they have to let fall off the table to prevent the peasants coming at them with pitchforks and torches. Government can ignore constitutional language like "shall not be infringed" each and every time they see it. Perhaps you fans of written constitutions could explain how your proposed magic-spell words will be more effective than "shall not be infringed".
Spooner seems to have called it right.
Ouch! Thanks, I didn't know of that quote.
Would you describe your own personal position as having some appreciation of the evils of government, but you do not see how to get rid of them? A negative result is also scientific progress. You do not have to have a better alternative in hand before you declare the current alternative to have failed. Nor do you have to be convinced by current ideas about anarchy. The historical record shows anarchy failing to liberate people from governments even more often than government enslaving them. Every government is a failure of anarchy.
I like the idea of expanding the self-defense weapon. A handgun gives a senior citizen in a wheelchair a chance against a robber. What self-defense balance of power effects would be created by a weapon that gives that senior citizen a chance against a team of home invaders? A large team? A small Golden Horde? If one could defend against twenty, might most of the twenty find honest jobs? Compare the improvements in automobiles in a hundred years vs. the improvement in handguns. Has the true purpose of gun control been preventing the conception and invention of a personal defensive weapon that makes politics uneconomic?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home