Dan posts this Politico link re a reliable stooge:
Having lived in NY at the time her husband and several others were killed by a madman on a Long Island Railroad commuter train, I've always wanted to ask her how she lives with the fact that New York gun control laws removed the most effective tool by the victims against the murderer.
Bring it on, you useless crone.
Top off your inventory of standard-capacity mags asap, boys and girls.
Did you see this part:
ReplyDeletePennsylvania Rep. Robert Brady, a Democrat from Philadelphia, told CNN that he also plans to take legislative action. He will introduce a bill that would make it a crime for anyone to use language or symbols that could be seen as threatening or violent against a federal official, including a member of Congress.
So is this another 'line in the sand' we have to cross?
ReplyDeleteSemper Fi, 0321
Linked at AP.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the heads up.
AP
I got my weapons and ammo. Plenty enough to hold my ground, so bring it on. I will die atop a pile of spent brass...
ReplyDeleteAs to Arctic's comment, call me a "criminal" then, because I'd like to see most CONgress critters dangling from lamp posts or trees for their TREASON.
Ya, all the posturing about "not backing up one more inch" is going to come to a head here or.....the 3% movement will be outed as a bunch of internet keyboard commandos.
ReplyDeleteOh HELL no.
ReplyDeleteNo.
They better not even THINK about it.
I bet McCarthy had this "new" legislation all written, waiting.
ReplyDeleteAt opposingviews.com, the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence takes the NRA to task for Charlton Heston's 2000 speech at the annual convention, at the end of which he hefted a FLINTLOCK over his head and proclaimed "From my cold, dead hands." Threatening violence against an oppressive government -- saying you'll give up your guns "one bullet at a time," for instance -- is "insurrection." You know, like when the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto decided to die on their feet with guns in their hands rather than in the showers of Zyklon-B poison gas in the camps. They offered violence to the duly-elected government. That's divisive, not to mention illegal. Jews had only been:
prohibited from owning business;
Forced to wear a distinguishing emblem on their clothes;
restricted to living in the worst parts of the cities;
forcibly removed from those ghettoes and "relocated" until there were few enough that it was practical to line them up and shoot them en masse IN those ghettoes.
It wasn't yet time, implies CSGV, to shoot back.
It's never time, until it's too late.
They also feel threatened by the recent "Norris the Vote" commercial.
Oh HELL no.
ReplyDeleteNo.
They better not even THINK about it.
Of course, don’t let a Tragedy go to waist.
ReplyDeleteI don’t think anyone expected any thing different.
Carolyn, come on, come and get it. Locked, Loaded and Ready to Go.
Dennis
III
Texas
PS of course people like alwats send someone else to do their dirty work.
Here's an interesting thought concerning "stocking up":
ReplyDeleteWhat if they do a new semi-auto rifle ban and standard-capacity rifle and pistol magazine ban -- but a real outright ban WITH NO GRANDFATHERING? With the last one, if you already had it, you could keep it and not be a felon. Will this one be new and "improved"?
I just feel it in the air. I don't expect more than symbolic opposition even from the Tea Party Republicans, seeing as how they're led by Eric "PATRIOT Act/Freedom Fondle" Cantor.
This isn't 1993. It's 1984 and 1939.
From the article: "Jared Lee Loughner, should not be able to buy a gun — and no one should be able to buy stockpiles of ammunition used by the 22-year-old assailant."
ReplyDeleteHow many rounds did the shooter have? Let's say it was 50. That means the ignorant lawmaker doesn't want anyone to be able to have 50 rounds at a time.
But don't worry. The NRA has your back on this, right?
That upper picture... Isn't that Sen. Dianne Feinstein brandishing an "assault weapon" at Congress and yelling "I have to tell you, I feel like taking some of you out!"?
ReplyDeleteRemember?
But THAT wasn't intimidating hate speech, it was a "plea" for "common-sense" gun laws. Or maybe an invitation to a day at the target range?
Carolyn McCarthy introduces gun legislation only slightly less frequently than the sun rises.
ReplyDelete"Top off your inventory of standard-capacity mags asap, boys and girls."
Care to place a friendly $20 wager on the odds of this bill going anywhere?
I think its the shoulder thing that goes up.SHESSH. And She writes laws.
ReplyDeleteChina
III
The line has been pushed back long ago or haven't you been paying attention? Now make sure everyone can see it. Start by making your phone calls to demand a full investigation of any connection between this shooting and the CIA. Demand all the accusers and attackers stop preaching a culture of evil and death. Speak the truth at all times about who it is promotes hatred in every form like infanticide, homosexual perversity, denial of real health care, etc. Demand investigations in to any elected person introducing bills that hinder the freedoms and liberties of America. MAKE THEM SO FUCKING BUSY THEY WON'T HAVE TIME TO WIPE THEIR ASSES LET ALONE DO MORE EVIL UPON THIS COUNTRY.
ReplyDeleteMayberry nailed it. And the Anonymous pig trolls continue. BATFE? DEA? FBI? Fusion center? It don't matter. The stench is overwhelming. And it smells like pig.
ReplyDelete"Legislative fixes"....my gawd, what idiocy.
ReplyDeleteBob
III
Carefull what you wish for Anonymous...while there are surely those among us who will not respond unless the line crossed is at their front door there are those among us who have no problem getting their hands dirty. This act is exactly the type of event that elicits an overhanded reaction from TPTB and serves to more clearly define the edges of chaos.
ReplyDeleteGrenadier1
Poor Carolyn, she has been trying for soooo long to get an anti gun law passed and her colleagues keep ignoring her.
ReplyDeleteAn absolute useless Congresscritter who keeps getting reelected, in the NY CD with the highest number of pistol permits in NY State.
This bill will go nowhere.
Tam:
ReplyDeleteNope. Still good idea IMHO. EOs can kill or impair imports and/or domestic production.
EOs can kill or impair imports and/or domestic production.--CA
ReplyDeleteThis is not at all relevant to Carolyn McCarthy's proposed legislation.
Tam is right. The new Congress will not approve an anti-gun measure.
MALTHUS
To all you who are saying this will go nowhere-
ReplyDeleteYou may be right.
THe difference, this time, is that now there's emotion attached to it. Who really thinks the "respectable" NRA type "2A is for hunting" people of the nation will come to the defense of those who would want "evil" 30 round mags (like me)?
I wouldn't be so sure that this goes nowhere...
AP
When are you going to start learning?
ReplyDeleteWho care about mag bans and how many permits you need. DEFY THEM!! JUST FUCKING DEFY THEM!! It's the beginning of YOUR move to FREEDOM. Stop complying with these idiotic laws and never spend one cent on a low capacity mag. NEVER! Or just put the gun in your mouth and pull the trigger. Either way, they won.
0321
Malthus:
ReplyDeleteI agree with you and Tam that Congressional action is not likely.
That is why I did not take her bet.
That is also why, if I were advising the President, I would recommend the executive order mechanism under a claim of fighting terrorism.
There are, after all, no legitimate reasons to have a 33 round mag for one's sidearm...just ask a number of the NRA's Board of Directors.
:-)