As advisers to the .gov's Senior Exective Service try to think through and then educate their bosses about Vanderboegh's latest letter to AG Eric Holder, you can bet that stories like this one as posted on Drudge yesterday will increase their consternation:***
READY TO REVOLT: Oath Keepers pledges to prevent dictatorship in United States
Group asks police and military to lay down arms in response to orders deemed unlawful
By ALAN MAIMON
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Depending on your perspective, the Oath Keepers are either strident defenders of liberty or dangerous peddlers of paranoia.
In the age of town halls, talk radio and tea parties, middle ground of opinion is hard to find.
Launched in March by Las Vegan Stewart Rhodes, Oath Keepers bills itself as a nonpartisan group of current and retired law enforcement and military personnel who vow to fulfill their oaths to the Constitution.
More specifically, the group's members, which number in the thousands, pledge to disobey orders they deem unlawful, including directives to disarm the American people and to blockade American cities. By refusing the latter order, the Oath Keepers hope to prevent cities from becoming "giant concentration camps," a scenario the 44-year-old Rhodes says he can envision happening in the coming years.
It's a Cold War-era nightmare vision with a major twist: The occupying forces in this imagined future are American, not Soviet.
"The whole point of Oath Keepers is to stop a dictatorship from ever happening here," Rhodes, a former Army paratrooper and Yale-trained lawyer, said in an interview with the Review-Journal. "My focus is on the guys with the guns, because they can't do it without them.
"We say if the American people decide it's time for a revolution, we'll fight with you."
That type of rhetoric has caught the attention of groups that track extremist activity in the United States.
In a July report titled "Return of the Militias," the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center singled out Oath Keepers as "a particularly worrisome example of the Patriot revival."
The Patriot movement, so named because its adherents believe the federal government has stepped on the constitutional ideals of the American Revolution, gained traction in the 1990s and has been closely linked to anti-government militia and white supremacist movements.
The movement is blamed for spawning Timothy McVeigh, who bombed a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995, killing 168 people.
"I'm not accusing Stewart Rhodes or any member of his group of being Timothy McVeigh or a future Timothy McVeigh," law center spokesman Mark Potok said. "But these kinds of conspiracy theories are what drive a small number of people to criminal violence. ... What's troubling about Oath Keepers is the idea that men and women armed and ordered to protect the public in this country are clearly being drawn into a world of false conspiracy theory."
Oath Keepers got some unwanted attention in April when an Oklahoma man loosely connected to the group was arrested for threatening violence at an anti-tax protest in Oklahoma City. Rhodes called the man "a nut" who had no real affiliation with his group.
Nonetheless, Potok's group now monitors Oath Keepers on its Web site blog "Hatewatch."
Oath Keepers is not preaching violence or government overthrow, Rhodes said. On the contrary, it is asking police and the military to lay down their arms in response to unlawful orders.
The group's Web site, http://www.oathkeepers.org, features videos and testimonials in which supporters compare President Barack Obama's America to Adolf Hitler's Germany. They also liken Obama to England's King George III during the American Revolution.
One member, in a videotaped speech at an event in Washington, D.C., calls Obama "the domestic enemy the Constitution is talking about."
According to the law center, militia groups are re-emerging in this country partly as a result of racial animosity toward Obama.
It's the "cross-pollinating" of extremist groups -- some racist, some not -- that is of concern, Potok said. As evidence that the danger is real, he points to several recent murders committed by men with anti-government or racist views.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security reached a similar conclusion in a report earlier this year about the rise of right-wing extremism. The report said the nation's economic downturn and Obama's race are "unique drivers for right-wing radicalization and recruitment."
The homeland security report added that "disgruntled military veterans" might be vulnerable to recruitment by right-wing extremist groups.
That warning was enough to make Rhodes feel paranoid.
"They're accusing anybody who opposes Obama of being a racist or a potential terrorist," he said. "What they're saying is, 'We're coming after you.'"
The motto of Oath Keepers: "Not on our watch!"
The message Rhodes hears from the government: We're watching you.
Las Vegas police Lt. Kevin McMahill said his department's homeland security bureau isn't overly concerned with Oath Keepers at this point, even though Rhodes says several active-duty Las Vegas officers are members of the group.
"I wouldn't classify Oath Keepers as no threat at all, but I wouldn't classify them as a threat either," McMahill said. "There's always a chance an individual can step outside the boundaries of what an organization stands for and do something wrong"...
***
The central question, IMHO, is whether the .gov thinks it can scoop up/suppress all of "the bad apples" without provoking more of reaction than state security forces can handle.
My guess?
Just like other issues on the political front, the powers-that-be recognize that time is not their friend.
Oath Keepers is a deeply-powerful C3I (command control communications intelligence) disruptive concept, which (most excellently) remains totally dormant unless and until the Bad People give unconstitutional orders.
As OK grows and spreads, so too do the problems for the Bad People and their plans for folks like Vanderboegh and others.
Be an Oath Keeper.
Help them grow today.
Forward.
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not out to get you.
ReplyDeleteOne man's paranoia, is another man's prudence.
Keep up the good work, and who did the Media Protest go, not like I will hear about it in the news.
The fact that the SPLC and others are starting to scream "racists!" and so on is a good sign. Remember, if you're drawing flak, its because you're over the target. Oath Keepers is touching a VERY raw nerve among the statists - it is a threat to their ability to impose their statist aims on all of us. Keep up the good work, Oath Keepers.
ReplyDeleteMore importantly, keep your oaths. We, the American People, continue to count on you...and this particular American, at least, is deeply and sincerely grateful for all that you brave men and women have done for this nation in the past and at present. With some luck and determination, you won't be forced to make a truly difficult choice sometime in the future (difficult not because of morality - that part is easy, you all know right from wrong - but because of the practicalities involved). Again, thank you all.
I was reading the LFG lizards all getting aflutter over this in their comments, and noticed that a great many of them wanted the Oathkeepers rounded up in a pogrom and drummed out of service.
ReplyDeleteAnd I thought, let's see, you want to prove that the Administration has no intention of doing anything illegal by rounding up all of the people who say they won't do illegal things and removing them from authority.
Oh, no, don't throw me in that briar patch!
I remember being sworn in and taking the oath, but I can't recall a ceremony releasing me from that oath. Nor do I remember an expiration date. Checked my DD214 and discharge papers and can't find one. Why would anyone think I would not keep my word? Oh, that's right, we're talking about journalists. People that know nothing of ethics, honor, or duty. Now I understand.
ReplyDeleteI cannot take their oath but I admire the Oath Keepers for the courage to take a public stand. I just hope they remember that integrity only counts when it's hard.
ReplyDelete