Consider the following:
An Infowars reader has sent a page taken from the Hardeman County, Tennessee, Bulletin Times announcing a seat belt checkpoint to be conducted on April 4 “in conjunction with a Homeland Security training exercise by the 251st Military Police in Bolivar who recently returned from Iraq” (see a PDF version of the announcement here, on page two of the linked hometown paper):
Although uniformed military personnel will be visible at the checkpoint, the military participation will be strictly observation. The military police uses checkpoints to disseminate information and ensure safe movement in the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster or other large-scale emergency.
Papiere, bitte.
And so we see that what was originally planned for Iowa has been relocated and modified - but not eliminated.
ReplyDeleteIch wille nicht.
The military personnel are there to "desensitize" the people to the presence of MILITARY ROADBLOCKS and CHECKPOINTS - coming soon everywhere if we don't stop this CRAP NOW!
ReplyDeleteGreat God in Heaven!!!! And of course they try to initiate it in a small place first, under the radar.
ReplyDeleteDo you think it would be OK with them if local citizens trained their Remingtons, Winchesters and Barretts on the soldiers from a safe distance, I mean, purely for observation purposes, so that they could have the practice on taking out foreign invaders from 300 + yards, if a time of crisis ever arrived? Surely having a crosshair or a green laser dot on their chests wouldn't bother them?
Yes! agreed. it is a process to de-sensitize the people to the idea of road blocks with military presence. What are they looking for this week? These are fishing expeditions for the state to snare you on some violation. Sheep Shearing.
ReplyDeleteThe question that comes to mind is why these particular places? Why Tennessee to do this one and Iowa to test the waters of home searches for guns? and why So. Cal for the DWI/ DUI with the Marines "observing"? I suspect that the powers that be do bit of research before the choose a place for these tests.
Someone with good research savvy could find the key to why they choose the places they choose for these test of constitutional violations. Is it the voting tendencies? Is based on age of the local population? or other demographic data? There must be a common thread. hmmmm???
Just to let you know, I set a link back to your blog here: Fred’s Faves
ReplyDeleteAs Anon has said, "Gott im Himmel!"
ReplyDeleteIt's nice to have something you forecast years ago come to pass, but................is it really?
As he also said, locals counter-training sounds like a real good ploy. After all "Fair's fair!", but somehow I don't think there would be any sense of Ha-ha and it could lead to disaster. Shameful, but true.
HABCAN.