No - America's "largest gun control organization" hasn't yet endorsed him.
Not yet.
But millions of Americans who sincerely consider themselves pro-RKBA and pro-freedom have, especially now that the Obamessiah has a virtual lock on the Democratic/America-Haters POTUS nomination.
For those people, who still have months to reconsider their views, here's your candidate's outreach to American voters on May 5th:
***
...as part of his commitment to talking with all Americans during this presidential campaign, the McCain presidential campaign announced that John McCain will attend the La Raza Annual Convention in San Diego on July 14, 2008.
***
You know La Raza, si?
Here's some detail on La Raza's fellow travellers, MEChA.
More background on the two organizations can be found here, including this excerpt:
***
...MEChA and the La Raza movement teach that Colorado, California, Arizona, Texas, Utah, New Mexico, Oregon and parts of Washington State make up an area known as "Aztlan" -- a fictional ancestral homeland of the Aztecs before Europeans arrived in North America. As such, it belongs to the followers of MEChA. These are all areas America should surrender to "La Raza" once enough immigrants, legal or illegal, enter to claim a majority, as in Los Angeles. The current borders of the United States will simply be extinguished.
This plan is what is referred to as the "Reconquista" or reconquest, of the Western U.S.
But it won't end with territorial occupation and secession. The final plan for the La Raza movement includes the ethnic cleansing of Americans of European, African, and Asian descent out of "Aztlan."
As Miguel Perez of Cal State-Northridge's MEChA chapter has been quoted as saying: "The ultimate ideology is the liberation of Aztlan. Communism would be closest [to it]. Once Aztlan is established, ethnic cleansing would commence: Non-Chicanos would have to be expelled -- opposition groups would be quashed because you have to keep power..."
***
It's really not surprising that McCain would continue his treasonous ways by currying support from La Raza and MEChA. After all, consider how he betrayed both his oath of office and the First Amendment through his successful sponsorship of the McCain-Feingold political speech restriction law, applicable to all Americans except the "authorized journalist" elites.
Once you have raped the First Amendment and its crystal clear prohibition that "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech...", what's a little border dispute amongst amigos?
What truly is surprising is how anyone who truly believes in both the RKBA and the rest of the Bill of Rights could even consider voting for McCain.
And don't whimper how there are no other choices - unless you want folks to come to some pretty unpleasant conclusions about your ethics set.
Here's one honorable option:
Lawn signs and other materials available here.
When faced with an edict to do Evil, the good man or woman refuses - no matter what the consequences.
Especially when "there's no other choice."
Tempus fugit.
If not McCain, then what??? Certainly not Hussein O. Gotta keep Hussein O out at virtually any cost, so that means a smelly vote for McCain. I'm no McLame fan, as I would prefer Dr. Paul, but that ain't gonna happen.
ReplyDeleteSo, Cabin Boy, what do you suggest??
Bobcat
I appreciate your input and the overall dilemma.
ReplyDeleteAm working on two essays that will lay out things as I see them.
One's election oriented, and the other is action oriented.
A sample of the election piece's rationale:
What if you took away the candidates' names and posed the question as
"You have two candidates for POTUS - one who wants to take your money and your few remaining freedoms, and the other that wants to take your few remaining freedoms and your money.
Choose."
Candidates are only unelectable if we allow ourselves to be convinced of such. Americans- citizens like you and I anonymous are the ones that allow themselves to be drawn into the two party system.
ReplyDeleteIf we want a third party candidate- we will get one.
as for that extremist group- I hope they remember to cleanse themselves. they were raped so bad by the Spanish when they arrived their isn't a 'pure' drop of blood among them.
pure ancestry is a ruse. anyone who thinks they are 100 % of anything just hasn't looked back far enough in their family tree.
as for their 'secession' that'll go over like a fart in church- even if they have the majority. It sets too much precedent, and takes away a lot of tax base. they can say whatever they want, but when it comes down to it- the .gov will roll in their and eff anyone up who tries to secede.
The Aztlanos will not face the same .gov response as would, say, a freedom-minded state or states wishing to secede.
ReplyDeleteAztlan serves the tyrants' agenda - destroy America as founded and lived until 1933, at the latest.
Am American secessionist movement based on individual freedom & responsibility, very low taxes, and extremely limited government, would need to eradicated root-and-branch, lest the message of "much more freedom, much less government" spread successfully around the world.
Can't let a heresy gain popularity, now can we?
;-)
I'm "going ugly early" and voting Democrat. It's what this country deserves. Too bad Hitlerly is not likely to gain the Demonrat nomination.
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome CabinBoy. I look forward to your essays.
ReplyDeleteMikespot, You are right about the two party system. Maybe I should rephrase my comment, "I'm no McLame fan, as I would prefer Dr. Paul, but the odds are heavily against him at this point." Keep in mind we did have an impact this time around. Let's hope there will be another 'round'.
Bobcat